The American people were actually denied the answer to that question. To me that is just devastating. We’re not even PERMITTED to KNOW what the CURRENT legal citizenship status of the sitting president is. . .and nobody cares. Nobody even asks the question — no one. WHY not? It’s clearly not an irrelevant question.

If Obama is currently & legally a dual-citizen (of the US & Indonesia) and he could be OR a tri-citizen (US, GB & Indonesia), then this is a FIRST in US history — ever — and nobody cares even though it’s clearly a serious “national security” matter now and in for all future POTUSs.

The Alinsky tactics (mockery) have worked. This is like the childhood book: “The Emperor’s New Cloths.” He’s not wearing any clothes yet everyone treats him as he is. Everyone is pretending. Why?

Watergate was nothing compared to this truly scary “cover-up.” This was a very successful and orchestrated “cover-up.”

The critical issue is NOT whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii. The question is: what is the definition of a NBC and IS mere birth on US soil ALL that is required to be a NBC of the US. I don’t think so. It is all that’s required to be a “US Citizen” but US citizen and NBC are not the same.

If they were, the Article II wouldn’t not have included the term: NBC.

A US “citizen at birth” could be any person born, in the USSR, to a Soviet father & American mother, who lived in the Soviet Union for all but 14 years of his/her life. Such a person would be a US citizen at birth. He’d be a US citizen simply because his mother was a US citizen.

The question is who is a Natural Born Citizen. The term “natural” and the term “native” are not the same. It is a critically serious matter — who is a NBC and can hold the single most powerful position in the US Govt — that of POTUS & C-in-C.

How can any dual or tri-citizen of the US and a Foreign country assume the presidency and WHY is this not a serious problem for the American people, especially those we’d assume it would be — Levin for one.

If Obama’s eligibility is not challenged, on Article II grounds, than anyone born to a communist Chinese or Cuban father or mother can become POTUS as long as he/she was born on US soil. This poses tremendous future danger to our national security.

While Obama wasn’t really influenced by his father (who wasn’t around b/c he abandoned the family), a future communist or fascist mother or father might be but the bar has already been lowered by Obama. It can’t be argued in the future that the kid (future POTUS candidate) was raised by a foreign communist/fascist b/c Obama has already made that argument irrelevant by getting elected.

For me, this is such a serious and scary matter and clearly affects, directly, US national security.

The Constitution does not permit the People to vote anyone they choose to the presidency. We, too, can only elect a NBC, 14 yrs residency and age 35. In order to comply with the restrictions the Constitution imposes on us, we must at least KNOW whether a Candidate is legally a NBC, has lived in the US for 14 yrs and is at least age 35.

We were, in fact, denied this information prior to the election and still. Very scary.

Zachary Taylor was born in Virginia after the Treaty of Paris was signed by representatives of the United States and representatives of George III, after Great Britain recognized the US as an independent and sovereign nation, but before the ratification of the Constitution.

The Constitution has two standards for eligibility to the presidency: one lesser, temporary standard, and one higher, permanent standard. The lesser standard was allowable only because no one of the greater standard was available until natural born citizens were born.

Even though he was born in Virginia, in the United States, Zachary Taylor was not a natural born citizen of the United States because there were others who were born at the same time in foreign lands under the allegiance of foreign governments who might have been a US citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution who would have been eligible under the lower standard. Zachary Taylor was eligible to the presidency under the lower standard, not the higher one.

Zachary Taylor was not a natural born citizen of the United States even though he was born in the United States, because he was born under the allegiance of the first government – the Articles of Confederation (1781). Those born under the Articles of Confederation or under the Emperor of China, so long as they were citizens of the United States at the time of the adoption of the US Constitution, were eligible under the lower standard

So, as Zachary Taylor’s example shows us, just being born in the United States is not the sole requirement for a person to be a natural born citizen of the United States.

http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/sep/27/00021/

Here is an excerpt from the article:
“Fortunately, we need not await the Supreme Court’s pleasure to enforce the whole Citizenship Clause and end drive-by citizenship. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment gives enforcement power to the Congress. Three bills exercising this authority are pending in the House. The best is H.J. Res. 42, sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, to amend the Constitution to deny citizenship to individuals born in the United States to parents who are neither U.S. citizens nor persons who owe permanent allegiance to America. Although an amendment is not necessary, Paul’s resolution is faithful to the Citizenship Clause.

Legislation enforcing the Citizenship Clause must also restore the traditional American rejection of dual citizenship. It should follow these principles:

* Children of U.S. citizens are citizens, wherever born.
* Children of an American and a foreign parent are treated as citizens until their 18th birthday. Then they must choose one citizenship; no dual nationality.
* U.S.-born children of legally resident aliens are not citizens at birth. If their parents naturalize while they are minor dependents they may naturalize with them (assuming no criminal record). Otherwise they pursue naturalization, if at all, as do other immigrants.
* U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are not citizens, period…”

So here we have another article on citizenship, before Obama was center-stage. See how his “citizenship” and life story fits into this description. Then ask yourself, how could he possibly be Article 2 “natural born”?

Where is Ron Paul now on this issue? Where is Mr. Sutherland? Where is Dr. Eastman, etc., and the Heritage Foundation? Why were all of these experts speaking out on the unconstitutionality of birthright/dual citizenship before Obama, and now seem to be quietly watching the “birthers” be ridiculed?

Will they remain quiet when the Amnesty bill is introduced? Or will more people begin to see this connection?

For a true understanding of what happened to this country, exactly how, and when it happened, this small book is a MUST-READ. And while the book addresses Texas, it applies equally to all 50 states. Facts are uncovered therein in a way that no-one else has done before. And although many have approached and analyzed the same subject matter they have missed the mark in understanding the enormity of what actually happened, and how to remedy the situation.

Please, if you wish to save this country you must download and read “Sins of the State”.

The book is absolutely without cost – researched and written by a true lover of freedom.

http://www.sinsofthestate.net/Home.html

Yes, a congressional coup d’etat designed to destroy the states in union (warned about by Texas Representatives) and establish a dictatorship!

For the first time ever “Sins of the State” reveals in a coherent manner precisely how Congress, now clearly seen for the racketeers that they are, pulled it off: How they completely overthrew the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and made the states and people “completely subject” to a bogus congressional authority.

Amongst many other revelations, “Sins” exposes:

•Precisely how all businesses and workers were federalized/nationalized, while maintaining the appearance of being private in character.

•Precisely how due process of the common-law, (developed over the centuries for the protection of the people and their property) was repealed and replaced with a system of counterfeit law, initially “pulled out of thin air” by an outlaw United States Supreme Court, one consequence being the abolition of private property rights abolished!

•Precisely how Congress abandoned constitutional office, eventually causing the whole of government, both of Texas and the union of states, to operate without valid constitutional authority.

•Precisely how the congressional outlaws have become a law unto themselves under the guise of a representative republic.

“Sins” unveils a concrete constitutional test for the Article VI Oath, and explains what is meant therein by “this Constitution” to which office holders are oath-bound; as well as how it and the “in Pursuance thereof” clause are intricately connected.

If you love what Texas and your country originally stood for, you will waste no time downloading “Sins” to truly understand the fraudulent system that has been intentionally established to exploit, oppress, and enslave the People of Texas as well as all of the United States of America under what only appears to be valid constitutional authority and law, but is not.
Richard Voudren
The Watchman

“The people are the masters of both Congress and courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it.”
Abraham Lincoln

If the people desire a return to the organic constitutional system, then the people, and not polititians, must first decide what to do with the perverted, anti-constitutional system (revealed in “Sins”) that all of America has been deceived into living in. This is the stark reality that faces us as Americans -will you turn away?

When he was adopted by Soetoro, he lost any natural born status anyway, he has never changed his name from Barry Soetoro back to Barack Obama and he may be in this country illegally.