Comments on: Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny

By: joebanana

joebanana — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:27:34 +0000

@Jim,April 5 7:07- Yeah.
With the NDAA, an official declaration of war on American citizens, we better come up with something quick. We’ve all seen how well “peaceably assembling to redress our grievances” works; it’s time for plan B. Ya see, the whole problem with declaring war on Americans in America is, we know where they live. We know where they work. We know. They will have maybe 4 or 5 thousand protectors; we will have millions of pissed-off Americans. And they ain’t going to bomb us when we’re in their front yard, or living room, or bathroom.

By: JQC

JQC — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:37:05 +0000

William Penn said it all: “If man is not governed by God, he will be ruled by tyrants.”

John Adams said, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion…Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other.

In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress.–John Adams

To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical Thomas Jefferson

“The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates.” – Tacitus

James Madison said, “It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what is will be tomorrow.”

It is too late!!!!

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:07:57 +0000

Traitors, you mean?

By: ron

ron — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:11:20 +0000

i do belive we still hang traders

By: ron

ron — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:06:51 +0000

i want to see them hauled out in cuffs. every damn stinking one of them.
the constitution is not the law of the land? since when? i really dont think they want to go there. i think there are about 300million people who will have something to say about that. holder needs to go! now! yesterday! these dems have compleetly gone mad if they think americans are going to put up with that for one second.

By: Pete

Pete — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:07:09 +0000

John,

You see what I see. Many of our fellow Americans are blind or mislead by a prejudicial media. My fear isn’t just Obama, but consider the disaster that lurks if the next administration is more corrupt than the current (you bring a knife and I bring a gun).

November 2010 will be a litmus test for Freedom and Constitution. The test fails, expect violence next.

Pete

By: A pen

A pen — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:58:20 +0000

That the people know the conduct of their rulers is of the greatest importance. Those who regard the sharing of information by alternate means than what was once thought to be the best avenue, television, are not only prudent but indispensable in the dissemination of facts and objective opinions. The events that are seemingly disconnected are rapidly congealing into an unmistakable event defined as a coup. One need only read the Declaration of Independence to discover there is a method for the people to throw off a government which is despotic but conversely know that a despotic government can form from the people. The protections against such a thing are many, or were many until the courts apprehended all but two. Those are now the states rights and the original right to keep and bear arms. Federalist 28 explores the response to usurpations by the national government and although it does not define the exact method it does define the response as legitimate. While cloaking their usurpations behind legal argument they are no closer to concreting their usurpation than the constitution itself is in preventing their attempt. The one thing they must know is the penalty for doing such an act requires their complete allegiance to the end they wish to achieve. That end is marked by contempt of the law and the positioning of a series of powers and bills readied for law or even assembled from long passed but un-enacted laws such that they may all at once be brought to bear against the patriotic defenders of the union. The process of passing such laws is now open for all to see as the push to pass health care legislation with the expressed intent of writing all damning parts of the law post process. Nancy Pelosi herself calls this “kicking down the door” for other legislation, which is at the ready, to follow in rapid succession. That is more akin to a plan of attack on a battlefield than any political process performed by a representative republican form of government the constitution allows for.

By: Cinncinatus Dogood

Cinncinatus Dogood — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:08:56 +0000

Arguments to prove what everyone knows. Obama is not a natural born citizen. He wrote it in his book. I bet he laughs every day at our lack of resolve.

By: JeanWTPUSA

JeanWTPUSA — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:13:34 +0000

Very good legal paper on STANDING, INJURY IN FACT, AND
PRIVATE RIGHTS
http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Hessick.pdf

By: jtx

jtx — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:38:53 +0000

Oh, and John – lest you wonder – I use the words “United States Constitutions” advisedly as plural since the DOJ seems to be reading from a U. S. Constitution different from any that I have ever read.