<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential Eligibility:  Three Simple Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vharlow</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6292</link>
		<dc:creator>vharlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-6292</guid>
		<description>I just inadvertently picked up my grandson&#039;s history book, 9th grade....was floored to read that the eligibility requirements are described as &quot;native citizen.&quot;  Indeed, I was outraged enough to fire off a shrieking email to the publisher, and since I&#039;ve got a Constitution in my pocket, were they in front of me, I&#039;d be waving it in their faces!  Everyone, check your child&#039;s history books!  Raise hell.  No wonder people are considered kooks when they are being mistaught....  Arrgh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just inadvertently picked up my grandson&#8217;s history book, 9th grade&#8230;.was floored to read that the eligibility requirements are described as &#8220;native citizen.&#8221;  Indeed, I was outraged enough to fire off a shrieking email to the publisher, and since I&#8217;ve got a Constitution in my pocket, were they in front of me, I&#8217;d be waving it in their faces!  Everyone, check your child&#8217;s history books!  Raise hell.  No wonder people are considered kooks when they are being mistaught&#8230;.  Arrgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THREE Simple Requirements &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>THREE Simple Requirements &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>[...] Article: The Post &amp; Email  John Jay, who insisted on including the &quot;natural born citizen&quot; clause in the U.S. Constitution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article: The Post &amp; Email  John Jay, who insisted on including the &quot;natural born citizen&quot; clause in the U.S. Constitution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tminu</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6174</link>
		<dc:creator>tminu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-6174</guid>
		<description>Well since he&#039;s not got one shred of evidence he&#039;s even a US citizen (let alone the higher standard of being a natural born citizen), this may as well be attacked on the &quot;ager&quot; issue, as he cannot prove he&#039;s 35 due to lack of any and all vitals, or that he&#039;s spent 14 years in the US due to sealed records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well since he&#8217;s not got one shred of evidence he&#8217;s even a US citizen (let alone the higher standard of being a natural born citizen), this may as well be attacked on the &#8220;ager&#8221; issue, as he cannot prove he&#8217;s 35 due to lack of any and all vitals, or that he&#8217;s spent 14 years in the US due to sealed records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FiddlerBob</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>FiddlerBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>This is a great article. However, I just about fell out of my chair laughing when you appealed to Obama&#039;s &quot;patriotism&quot;. 

Barack Hussein Obama is not a patriot. He is a fraud and a usurper acting with full knowledge, malice and intent to destroy our country and institute a Marxist-communist dictatorship. The good news is that he will fail. The bad news is that he is not alone in his work.

Correcting this mess is going to take a lot of persistence and courage from the real patriots. The situation Mr. Obama and his conspirators have created has the potential to get very nasty very quickly. Your educational efforts are exactly what we need to lead our nation to a rational, non-violent resolution. Thank you and please keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. However, I just about fell out of my chair laughing when you appealed to Obama&#8217;s &#8220;patriotism&#8221;. </p>
<p>Barack Hussein Obama is not a patriot. He is a fraud and a usurper acting with full knowledge, malice and intent to destroy our country and institute a Marxist-communist dictatorship. The good news is that he will fail. The bad news is that he is not alone in his work.</p>
<p>Correcting this mess is going to take a lot of persistence and courage from the real patriots. The situation Mr. Obama and his conspirators have created has the potential to get very nasty very quickly. Your educational efforts are exactly what we need to lead our nation to a rational, non-violent resolution. Thank you and please keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick G</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>Thanx for the link...

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/

Gunny G
*****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the link&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/" rel="nofollow">http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/</a></p>
<p>Gunny G<br />
*****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>a good summary at 
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a good summary at<br />
<a href="http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/" rel="nofollow">http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/obama-birth-certificate-hawaii-revised-law/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old1</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>old1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>Obama is a student of Constitutional law. He has to know he is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS. Therefore he knows he has committed election fraud. He has done nothing about this crime against Constitutional Law. That is TREASON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a student of Constitutional law. He has to know he is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS. Therefore he knows he has committed election fraud. He has done nothing about this crime against Constitutional Law. That is TREASON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>Exactly Ms. Vendee.  About the definition of natural born citizen there is considerable documentary evidence.  In fact, Jefferson enaugurated a course at William and Mary eight years before ratification on The Law Of Nature and of Nations, using the same text, Vattel&#039;s Law of Nations cited by chief justices Marshall and Waite, among others, in cases in which they both reiterated the definition, and cited the most familiar source, Vattel.  Vattel was the most cited legal reference between 1789 and 1820, and remained the text at William and Mary until 1841.  James Wilson too taught a course based upon Vattel beginning in 1790.  

What was clever about the Obama team was the concealment of documents which probably will not incriminate Obama.  That way, if some case reaches discovery citing Obama&#039;s citizenship, or &quot;Native born U.S. citizenship&quot;, Obama will be cleared and no other case will likely be taken seriously by the public.  That is the trap which could explain why Levin, Limbaugh, Beck, stay clear of questions about citizenship.  It may also be the case that some of those loudly proclaiming doubts about Obama&#039;s citizenship are Obama operatives.  They play into the hands of Anita Dunn&#039;s husband, now White House Legal Council.  The most important fact, and one about which there is no doubt, because Obama has publically declared its truth, is that Obama&#039;s father was an alien.  He had no intention of becoming a citizen.  That our founders wanted to protect us from just that circumstance is easily demonstrated.  That principle was repeated in 2008 by Patrick Leahy, Michael Chertoff, Hillary Clinton, and even Barack Obama in Senate Res. 511.  

Calmly explaining this to the public is now the challenge, and you have contributed.  We won&#039;t get much help from the GOP because they were complicit in covering up Obama&#039;s ineligibility to keep Obama from demanding the resignation of McCain, who is not eligible either.  One, McCain, was not &quot;born in the country&quot;.  The other, Obama was not &quot;born of citizen parents.&quot; The two terms are often referred to as jus soli and jus sanguinis.  They comprise the definition of natural born citizenship, and are required only to be president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Ms. Vendee.  About the definition of natural born citizen there is considerable documentary evidence.  In fact, Jefferson enaugurated a course at William and Mary eight years before ratification on The Law Of Nature and of Nations, using the same text, Vattel&#8217;s Law of Nations cited by chief justices Marshall and Waite, among others, in cases in which they both reiterated the definition, and cited the most familiar source, Vattel.  Vattel was the most cited legal reference between 1789 and 1820, and remained the text at William and Mary until 1841.  James Wilson too taught a course based upon Vattel beginning in 1790.  </p>
<p>What was clever about the Obama team was the concealment of documents which probably will not incriminate Obama.  That way, if some case reaches discovery citing Obama&#8217;s citizenship, or &#8220;Native born U.S. citizenship&#8221;, Obama will be cleared and no other case will likely be taken seriously by the public.  That is the trap which could explain why Levin, Limbaugh, Beck, stay clear of questions about citizenship.  It may also be the case that some of those loudly proclaiming doubts about Obama&#8217;s citizenship are Obama operatives.  They play into the hands of Anita Dunn&#8217;s husband, now White House Legal Council.  The most important fact, and one about which there is no doubt, because Obama has publically declared its truth, is that Obama&#8217;s father was an alien.  He had no intention of becoming a citizen.  That our founders wanted to protect us from just that circumstance is easily demonstrated.  That principle was repeated in 2008 by Patrick Leahy, Michael Chertoff, Hillary Clinton, and even Barack Obama in Senate Res. 511.  </p>
<p>Calmly explaining this to the public is now the challenge, and you have contributed.  We won&#8217;t get much help from the GOP because they were complicit in covering up Obama&#8217;s ineligibility to keep Obama from demanding the resignation of McCain, who is not eligible either.  One, McCain, was not &#8220;born in the country&#8221;.  The other, Obama was not &#8220;born of citizen parents.&#8221; The two terms are often referred to as jus soli and jus sanguinis.  They comprise the definition of natural born citizenship, and are required only to be president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtx</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5848</link>
		<dc:creator>jtx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5848</guid>
		<description>Actually, Obama&#039;s whole life seems to be nothing but a work of fiction.  The man has never shown himself to be Constitutionally eligible to hold the office he now occupies.

If you&#039;d like to see something from a different point of view, watch the two short videos below which, even though they start slowly and have a bit of fun, contain a wealth of factual data - more than we&#039;ve seen from Obama.

In fact in the second video a famous senator is quoted speaking about someone that sounds for all the world like &quot;Our Boy&quot; and really strikes a chord.

Only thing is the senator was the Roman named Cicero speaking in 42 BC - but the message is still very directed and pertinent for all of us:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Three Little Words&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Obama&#8217;s whole life seems to be nothing but a work of fiction.  The man has never shown himself to be Constitutionally eligible to hold the office he now occupies.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to see something from a different point of view, watch the two short videos below which, even though they start slowly and have a bit of fun, contain a wealth of factual data &#8211; more than we&#8217;ve seen from Obama.</p>
<p>In fact in the second video a famous senator is quoted speaking about someone that sounds for all the world like &#8220;Our Boy&#8221; and really strikes a chord.</p>
<p>Only thing is the senator was the Roman named Cicero speaking in 42 BC &#8211; but the message is still very directed and pertinent for all of us:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU" rel="nofollow">Three Little Words</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY" rel="nofollow">Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtx</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/presidential-eligibility-three-simple-requirements-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator>jtx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8532#comment-5847</guid>
		<description>If you go to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://puzo1.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mario Apuzzo website&lt;/a&gt; and actually read the Initial Appeals Brief of Jan 19, 2010, you&#039;re in for a real eye-opener (as are the DOJ attorneys &quot;defending&quot; Obama using our tax money).

That&#039;s doubly ironic since these attorneys - and their bosses - took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign AND domestic but they are now in the position of actually attacking that very document rather than defending it and are trying to get an obviously ineligible man to remain in an office he has never shown himself to be eligible to hold.

The wonderful Apuzzo Brief is a primer on both Constitutional law, the meaning of it,  the Founders&#039; intent vis-a-vis Article II of the Constitution and a forceful put-down of the lies and misinformation put forth by the Obama Flying Monkeys such as &quot;smrstrauss&quot; and others.

I’d urge everyone to read the Initial Appeals Brief from Attorney Apuzzo’s website along with the many essays by both Mario Apuzzo AND his Lead Plaintiff, Charles F. Kerchner.  While there, it would really help to donate even a small amount to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.protectourliberty.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the publicity/education fund&lt;/a&gt; presently used only for full-page newspaper ads in the Washington Times National Weekly Edition.

The Brief gives a very good overview of the original action AND it puts the lie to the many false arguments by the Obot Flying Monkeys about why BHO is either (their words) eligible to hold the office he now occupies OR that it (their words) doesn’t matter that he is not eligible. Your understanding of the relation of the U. S. Constitution to We The People will be forever enlightened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to the <a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Mario Apuzzo website</a> and actually read the Initial Appeals Brief of Jan 19, 2010, you&#8217;re in for a real eye-opener (as are the DOJ attorneys &#8220;defending&#8221; Obama using our tax money).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s doubly ironic since these attorneys &#8211; and their bosses &#8211; took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign AND domestic but they are now in the position of actually attacking that very document rather than defending it and are trying to get an obviously ineligible man to remain in an office he has never shown himself to be eligible to hold.</p>
<p>The wonderful Apuzzo Brief is a primer on both Constitutional law, the meaning of it,  the Founders&#8217; intent vis-a-vis Article II of the Constitution and a forceful put-down of the lies and misinformation put forth by the Obama Flying Monkeys such as &#8220;smrstrauss&#8221; and others.</p>
<p>I’d urge everyone to read the Initial Appeals Brief from Attorney Apuzzo’s website along with the many essays by both Mario Apuzzo AND his Lead Plaintiff, Charles F. Kerchner.  While there, it would really help to donate even a small amount to <a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">the publicity/education fund</a> presently used only for full-page newspaper ads in the Washington Times National Weekly Edition.</p>
<p>The Brief gives a very good overview of the original action AND it puts the lie to the many false arguments by the Obot Flying Monkeys about why BHO is either (their words) eligible to hold the office he now occupies OR that it (their words) doesn’t matter that he is not eligible. Your understanding of the relation of the U. S. Constitution to We The People will be forever enlightened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

