<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redstate.com Bans the Eligibility Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5691</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5691</guid>
		<description>Great Post by Phil in answer to the two RedState posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post by Phil in answer to the two RedState posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Side of Life &#187; #eligibility: The Dangerous Question That&#8217;s Not Just for Presidents</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5685</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Side of Life &#187; #eligibility: The Dangerous Question That&#8217;s Not Just for Presidents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5685</guid>
		<description>[...] course, things didn&#8217;t end there. John Charlton over at The Post &amp; Email responded to Mr. Erickson&#8217;s editorial decision, to which Mr. Erickson then responded to the response [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, things didn&#8217;t end there. John Charlton over at The Post &amp; Email responded to Mr. Erickson&#8217;s editorial decision, to which Mr. Erickson then responded to the response [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vharlow</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5654</link>
		<dc:creator>vharlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>American Majority has now also done the same thing, even calling it &quot;truthers and birfers&quot; just as Erickson did.  Sheep.  Follow the leader....  They are all following their leader...and it must be Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American Majority has now also done the same thing, even calling it &#8220;truthers and birfers&#8221; just as Erickson did.  Sheep.  Follow the leader&#8230;.  They are all following their leader&#8230;and it must be Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra J.M. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra J.M. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>Very good point, forseti.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point, forseti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5646</link>
		<dc:creator>b fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5646</guid>
		<description>I have never been to that website either as I have seen Erickson on Hannity several times and had already concluded he was an idiot.  He is a good example of people inside the beltway losing their minds and forgetting about normal lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never been to that website either as I have seen Erickson on Hannity several times and had already concluded he was an idiot.  He is a good example of people inside the beltway losing their minds and forgetting about normal lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fox and The King &#171; My Very Own Point of View</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5644</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fox and The King &#171; My Very Own Point of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5644</guid>
		<description>[...] Theories of Birthers, 9/11 Truthers” the report echoes the terminology and strategy adopted by Eric Erickson of Redstate.com; lump a legitimate constitutional, pro-American issue with an illegitimate anti-American issue so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Theories of Birthers, 9/11 Truthers” the report echoes the terminology and strategy adopted by Eric Erickson of Redstate.com; lump a legitimate constitutional, pro-American issue with an illegitimate anti-American issue so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5633</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5633</guid>
		<description>You have oft heard it said ; that we are a nation of immigrants well.....
The Founders/Framers had no﻿ intentions, what-so-ever, of permitting NON- U.S. immigrants to install their offspring as Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces aka &quot;The President&quot;
ARTICLE II SEC1 CL 5
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN=BORN OF CITIZEN PARENTS-ON THE SOIL UNITY OF CIT AT BIRTH NOTHING SHORT OF THIS PRESCRIPTION IS ACCEPTABLE NBC IS NOT A RIGHT IT IS THE PATH YOU TRAVELED TO YOUR CITIZENSHIP GRADE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have oft heard it said ; that we are a nation of immigrants well&#8230;..<br />
The Founders/Framers had no﻿ intentions, what-so-ever, of permitting NON- U.S. immigrants to install their offspring as Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces aka &#8220;The President&#8221;<br />
ARTICLE II SEC1 CL 5<br />
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN=BORN OF CITIZEN PARENTS-ON THE SOIL UNITY OF CIT AT BIRTH NOTHING SHORT OF THIS PRESCRIPTION IS ACCEPTABLE NBC IS NOT A RIGHT IT IS THE PATH YOU TRAVELED TO YOUR CITIZENSHIP GRADE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5631</link>
		<dc:creator>C.Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5631</guid>
		<description>Red State/Conservatives?
I went to this web site for the first time, thought It was for Obot&#039;s. Maybe they are the Country Club, Beck/O&#039;reilly variety of Conservative who get a little queasy when things get uncomfortable. Cowards
I have more respect for the Dem&#039;s who challenged John Mc Cain on the NBC issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red State/Conservatives?<br />
I went to this web site for the first time, thought It was for Obot&#8217;s. Maybe they are the Country Club, Beck/O&#8217;reilly variety of Conservative who get a little queasy when things get uncomfortable. Cowards<br />
I have more respect for the Dem&#8217;s who challenged John Mc Cain on the NBC issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Charlton</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>John Charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>Dear readers of The Post &amp; Email,

Eric Ericson has posted his &quot;final thought&quot; on the Eligiblity Question...

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/02/14/my-final-thought-on-the-birther-issue/

Read it, it&#039;s juicy...

&quot;final thought&quot; is a misnomer, however; as it seems that Erickson is not really capable of the exercise of his rational faculty, and actually seems emotionally tied up with the impulse to deny such a use....for someone with a law degree, Erickson is a shocking example of a closed liberal mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear readers of The Post &#038; Email,</p>
<p>Eric Ericson has posted his &#8220;final thought&#8221; on the Eligiblity Question&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/02/14/my-final-thought-on-the-birther-issue/" rel="nofollow">http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/02/14/my-final-thought-on-the-birther-issue/</a></p>
<p>Read it, it&#8217;s juicy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;final thought&#8221; is a misnomer, however; as it seems that Erickson is not really capable of the exercise of his rational faculty, and actually seems emotionally tied up with the impulse to deny such a use&#8230;.for someone with a law degree, Erickson is a shocking example of a closed liberal mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thistle</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/13/redstate-com-bans-eligbility-question/comment-page-2/#comment-5620</link>
		<dc:creator>thistle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=8019#comment-5620</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never heard of this Redstate.com website, so it didn&#039;t matter much to me, but it was very funny when I heard my husband say this morning that he was deleting any future communication from them after he read about the &quot;no further posts regarding the Obama b.c.&quot;  I had no idea that it was one of the ones that he frequently read.  Over 40 years together and there&#039;s still some surprises.  We are both conservative, but read different news sites for our information.  I tend to think that it gives us double the conservative news exposure.

----------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Redstate.com proposes itself as a leading Republican news source from Washington D.C..

What I do not understand, being someone who has never affiliated with any party, a sort of political neophyte...is how naive politically Redstate.com&#039;s editor is.

If the opposition is making fun of you for an issue, you don&#039;t stop talking about that issue, you first investigate as to the motivations of the opposition and why they feel so vulnerable on that issue, and if they are vulnerable, you don&#039;t comply with their ridicule, you double your push of that issue and use it to defeat them.

If you are afraid of the laughter of your enemies, you only show yourself to be pyschologically and emotionally unprepared for war.

I gather that this Ericson does not come from a military family, because he shows little signs of the virtues which reign therein.

If I were a big supporter of Redstate.com financially, I&#039;d give them a phone call and ask them when did they lose both their marbles and their masculinity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard of this Redstate.com website, so it didn&#8217;t matter much to me, but it was very funny when I heard my husband say this morning that he was deleting any future communication from them after he read about the &#8220;no further posts regarding the Obama b.c.&#8221;  I had no idea that it was one of the ones that he frequently read.  Over 40 years together and there&#8217;s still some surprises.  We are both conservative, but read different news sites for our information.  I tend to think that it gives us double the conservative news exposure.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Redstate.com proposes itself as a leading Republican news source from Washington D.C..</p>
<p>What I do not understand, being someone who has never affiliated with any party, a sort of political neophyte&#8230;is how naive politically Redstate.com&#8217;s editor is.</p>
<p>If the opposition is making fun of you for an issue, you don&#8217;t stop talking about that issue, you first investigate as to the motivations of the opposition and why they feel so vulnerable on that issue, and if they are vulnerable, you don&#8217;t comply with their ridicule, you double your push of that issue and use it to defeat them.</p>
<p>If you are afraid of the laughter of your enemies, you only show yourself to be pyschologically and emotionally unprepared for war.</p>
<p>I gather that this Ericson does not come from a military family, because he shows little signs of the virtues which reign therein.</p>
<p>If I were a big supporter of Redstate.com financially, I&#8217;d give them a phone call and ask them when did they lose both their marbles and their masculinity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

