http://www.scribd.com/doc/26214034/NOTICE-OF-MOTION-with-Strunk-w-Affidavit-and-Exs-in-Support-of-Intervention-in-Taitz-v-Obama-DCD-10-Cv-00151-RCL-013010

Again, the former slaves and their children were in fact natural born citizens empowered to be POTUS/CINC, non-slave anchor babies were not 14th amendment material.

finally, if no anchor babies being automatic citizens, should/would the prior anchor baby “citizens” be grand-fathered US citizens or have their US citizenship revoked or give an new different temporary status.

—————

Mr. Charlton replies: Though the institution of hereditary slavery is contrary to the natural law, nevertheless citizenship in fact is regulated by positive human law; so one cannot say that prior to the 14th amendment slaves and their children were natural born citizens; but rather that according to the natural law they deserved to be recognized as such. The 14th amendment sanatized a legal tradition which presupposed the injustice of race slavery; a form of slavery unknow in Roman Law and condemned by the Roman Pontiff in the latter half of the 16th century, but which spread under the economic enticements of slave labor and the Dutch slave trade, which was enormously lucrative. Succeeding decades of such practice created in common law a notion of slave holding which went from being illicit, to de facto, to a customary right, to being enacted into many of the early laws of each colony.

The 14th Amendment, therefore, is squarely in the tradition of Constitutional principles, since our nation was founded in such a manner that common law of England was corrected by the institution of natural law principles which would take precedent to the errant parts of common law. And race slavery’s recognition in early colonial and US law was based on such errant common law.

” any human being born on U.S. soil to parents owing no allegiance to any foreign power is, in the language of the Consitution itself, a natural born citizen… ”

Clearly, the 14th Amendment only confers citizenship, but NOT natural born citizenship. According to the 14th Amendment (and its author) …. the allegiance of the parents was a primary requisite to natural born citizenship… along with place of birth and in addition to it.

Thus a native born person would be a citizen, but a native born person born to two citizens would then be a natural born citizen….. and ONLY this class of citizens is eligible to be President (meeting age and residency requirements also).

Clearly then, by his own admission, Barack Obama does NOT meet one of the primary requirements to be a “natural born citizen” of the USA.

And thus, he is CLEARLY NOT qualified to seek and hold the office of President. Pity that no court sees and understands this and will take up the issue.

Which, means the We the People must not give up the quest for proof.

But first I suggest Orly in her USDC-DC 10-151 case “Taitz v Obama” keep an eye on the related case (USDC-NYED 09-4888 “ACORN v US”) ACORN suing US (us) to injoin/ bar the federal (and state/local) goverment from banning further ACORN funding.

ACORN hired the former Mass AG to “investigate” itself and provide its own umpire — see:

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/08/acorn-whitewash-acorn-report-is-dishonest-legal-hair-splitting/

—————-

Mr. Charlton replies: Delquattro you ask a question that a lot of Obots ask, because Obots ask — pardon my language — stupid questions to misdirect patriots.

Not everyone gets a SSN at birth; infact nearly nobody used to. I got mine when I turned 18. When the SS Act was introduced, obviously (I think in the 40′s) those born in the 1890′s probably started to get one. So use a little common sense, please…!

So obviously if someone born in the 1890′s got on in the 50′s and died in the 60′s in Hawaii, then someone (Madelyn Payne Dunham), working with county records, could steal that SSN and used it for her grandson. That’s the implication in several filings, filed by Dr. Taitz at least.

The implication has this significance: SSNs are not reissued to other persons. Mobsters and KGB and criminals use SSNs of the dead. To get a SSN you had to show a BC; if Obama was not born in the USA, perhaps that explains why he had to steal a SSN from a US Citizen, and has been using such all his life.