Comments on: The Real Conspiracy is the one they won’t talk about

By: plain jane

plain jane — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:44:00 +0000

I just don’t understand why the fix would be in? What is in it for the republicans? The whole thing makes no sense. Even the senate came up with that interpretation when McCain was questioned, that you had to have two US citizen parents. Well hello, duh, BHO doesn’t and he admitted it so where is the controversy? There didn’t have to be any investigation or show of documents. He incriminated himself, no republican had to, so where is the downside? There is something still so strange about this story.

——————–

Mr. Charlton replies: What most people do not know or fail to admit, is that the Republican Party is controlled at the financial level by the same social class as the Democratic Party, and that the Republican party for a long time, and now elements of the Tea Party are under the same control and serve no so much to be true opposition, but theatrical opposition, so as to blunt any real reaction and opposition to the agenda of International Socialism. That is why Democrats work hardest against true social conservative Christians who run on Republican tickets, and attack them when they run in Republican primaries against progressive Republicans like McCain.

By: Kenneth

Kenneth — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:26:08 +0000

To all that are demanding senate trial I say forget it . There will be no action from any senator on this at all because they are in on the fix. If senators held a hearing on this all we would get would be their covering their rear,
They have all been asked to look into this and some will not even reply to person asking . what does this tell you?
I think we all need to be looking into third party as both parties are against America. Look at last three presidents each has added to federal control a little at a time until we have reached present time. with or without majority in congress this continues and party in power goes along with it so how can we keep trusting either party?
Some say to take over the Republican party but I do not believe the top will go so easy, they will keep putting roadblocks in the way to keep people from electing the candidates they want such as fixing primaries so party candidate wins.

By: The Real Conspiracy «

The Real Conspiracy « — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:37:35 +0000

[...] THERE IS MUCH EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT AN AGREEMENT WAS MADE TO PUSH OBAMA AND IGNORE THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT Article: The Post & Email [...]

By: TexomaEd

TexomaEd — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:55:18 +0000

Interesting analysis and math. I am with you on the 14-year residency requirement and foreign influence. I understand what you mean by protection from foreign influence in years 0 to 21 — being born on US soil and parented by US citizens — but natural born citizenship is more about how citizenship is attained. It is attained by the law of nature and not by the law of man (not even the 14th amendment). If you are born in the US to citizen parents then you are obviously and “naturally” a US citizen — you are a natural born citizen! And the US is the only nation with any claim upon your allegiance at birth.

By: lc

lc — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:31:33 +0000

Actually, there is nothing in “The Obama Nation” questioning Obama’s birth or Constitutional eligibility.

And Corsi never went to Kenya after the election.

By: jtx

jtx — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:04:24 +0000

If any of you have not wondered why NONE of the MainStreamMedia have even offered a peep about Obama’s lack of Constitutional eligibility, here’s a very likely explanation (the thread begins “I Believe …”):

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

And if you’ve not heard any of the reasons he’s NOT eligible, check other blog entries on that site and, for fun (though they start slowly), check these links for understandable information:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU Three Little Words

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:50:16 +0000

In all likelihood there was deal between the DNC and RNC since both 2008 candidates have Article II issues. While there is no doubt about the loyalty and service of McCain there is the nagging fact that he was born in a foreign country in the local hospital and not ‘on the base’. Technically, the is a very real potential a nbC issue. So it appears there was a deal of silence on the issue. This could explain the silence from the conservative radio and TV hosts. If the RNC is ‘in on it’ then these host might also alienate themselves from access to the RNC and the republicans that come on their shows. So under threat of not having guests for their programs they go along with the silence. Except Lou Dobbs and look at his fate.

There is still the question of Hillary. Why did her campaign not play this out? Paid off? Counter threat of undesired disclosure? The answer of the ‘they looked and found nothing of substance there’ is ludicris.

By: b fuller

b fuller — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:17:59 +0000

I have been banned from several talk shows and websites for pushing the issue with the hosts. I have told Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly that they are cowards and hypocrites for their stances. Once, I went as far as I could up the corporate chain at FOX to state my case about the Saudi ownership and the BO eligibility issues. I was escorted from the building for my troubles. Until hard proof that is irrefutable can be made public we are all simply pawns to the progressives.

By: susan h

susan h — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:02:30 +0000

If any of you read “Obama Nation” by Jerome Corsi, Corsi tried to uncover the facts and get birth records as he insists Obama is not eligible. He even went to Kenya to try and access birth/identity records AFTER the election and was detained there by the government and I did hear later he was finally released and got out of the country “with his life”. I saw him briefly a few months ago on some show but he has been toned down. I imagine he was threatened and terrorized and will not pursue this will the same intensity as before.

By: jtx

jtx — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:11 +0000

It is becoming abundantly clear that Obama is not legally eligible to hold the office he now occupies – and that many in not only his own political party but in BOTH political parties are covering up that fact.

The website for Kerchner et al v. Obama et al has links to innumerable treatises that clearly show the legal reasoning behind this truth (just search around on it a bit but especially the Jan. 19, 2010 Initial Appeals Brief ):

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

… or, if that seems too legalistic check these two short videos which start slowly and really dig into the heart of the matter:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU Three Little Words

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!