Comments on: Donofrio & Pidgeon file Motion for Reconsideration in Chrysler case

By: The Right Side of Life » Chrysler Bankruptcy: Motion to Reconsider Filed; FBN Video

Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:53:16 +0000

[...] Post & Email published an accurate report on the [...]

By: hedgewren

hedgewren — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:54:07 +0000

I saw something on the Citzenwells site that somebody had posted as a reply to one of the columns.
This person suggested that O’s executive order that would allow Interpol full authority in the U.S. may be because they have O’s Birth Certificate and other concealed information as his school records, passports,ect.
Could it be possible? Is O vulnerable to blackmail because of his secrecy?

——————-

Mr. Charlton replies: I think this is speculation; and unfounded…Obama is an internationalist…this is payback for electing him president of the security council…he probably thinks it looks bad that he is president of a council when interpol does not have immunity in the USA….its obviously a violation of our sovereignty to give any police organization diplomatic immunity…this is not the same case for foreign embassies, since the latter have no authority over us citizens. It also creates grave constitutional issue regarding the information gathered or given to interpol by American security agencies, since defendents in court seem will not have access to these documents any longer…

By: kittycat

kittycat — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:31:00 +0000

John,

It may be something that you have to ask Leo about. I posted a question over at Zapem to see if someone has heard anything about Justin Riggs.

By: kittycat

kittycat — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:55:44 +0000

John, here’s what it’s about, which I’m sure that you’ll remember it:

http://citizensagainstproobamamediabias.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/kyle-two-different-official-certification-of-nomination-forms-from-pelosi/

By: kittycat

kittycat — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:53:46 +0000

Hi, John:

I have a question. Do you remember Justin Riggs who was over at Leo’s blog periodically? He was supposed to have found out some important information about the DNC’s certification or whatever it was. I tried to go to his blog yesterday and it’s no longer there. Have you heard of anything about Justin?

thanks

—————

Mr. Charlton replies: No, Kittycat; but Justin, if you are out there, I do want to ask you some things…so please contact me.

By: Ray McCabe

Ray McCabe — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:03:08 +0000

Mr. Charlton:

I totally agree. Each day I fight back the urge to ask all the questions because I realize, at this point, they would just be a distraction.

Thanks

By: DCBikerJohn

DCBikerJohn — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:05:10 +0000

Where’s the QUO WARRANTO?

————————-

Mr. Charlton replies: This case is not in D.C., and the courts pretent quo warranto is only in that court.

By: RayMcc

RayMcc — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:13:46 +0000

Thinkwell, I agree. What is the status of Quo Warranto? As Mr. Charlton states, it is the same plaintifs, also, Donofrio stated that they would file this suit in NY and the Quo Warranto in DC. So I would also like to know the status, if anything. I believe they stated that they would file the NY suit and the DC Quo Warranto the next week. Let’s hope next week gets it done.

Will the motion by Taitz to move her Quo Warranto from CA to DC have any effect on the Donofrio filing?

Thanks for the info, JC

————-

Mr. Charlton replies: Don’t know, Ray…and we need to temper our curiosity, to let the lawyers do their work…

By: thinkwell

thinkwell — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:01:22 +0000

Excellent news. Donofrio and Pidgeon have cut directly to the heart of the injustice of the case and present what appears to be undeniably winning evidence, precedent and legal logic. I especially like the way the judge’s feet are held to the light of the fire of the law to clearly imply how his prior poor judgment might soon burn him as well, if he does not take the generously given chance to save his own sorry hide by quickly and completely correcting his obviously in-the-tank ruling. Bravo boys!

This otherwise detailed report is only missing one thing – what is the current status of the Quo Warranto portion of the lawsuit?

In any case, thanks for the great website, J.C.
——————

Mr. Charlton replies: Thinkwell, this is an entirely different case; note it refers to the Bankrupcy Court in NY, not the DC court case…same plaintifs though, I think…but in the NY one their are called movants…