<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizens prepare to take legal action against HI Department of Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krist</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Krist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4871#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>Well, the last person to know the &quot;legal and contitutional&quot; definition of &quot;natural born&quot; citizen would be a medical doctor; and certainly one in hawaii. De. Fukino does not have the expertise to define, &quot;natural born&quot;. This term takes some time for a normal person to understand it after much studing.

So Dr. Fukino is not the person to say; However,
what can be done is that one or many of citzens sign a letter and fill out the request showing that have reason to request the birth certificate of Obama. The Dept of Health then DOES have the responsibility to release it.
Be sure you put on the application, you as a citizen have the right has he ran for office, was elected and your US Constitution states there are birth requirements. Demand the Hawaii department give them to you. We can make it difficult for the state of hawaii if they don&#039;t release it or at least they will be forced into the court to show just cause why NOT.
The  right place for this was the US Supreme Ct and the Federal Courts (judical branch of gov. when the other 2 fail) but they have failed the people.
Dont ask the hawaii officials their opinoin, it is just that &quot;an opinion&quot;. Demand a certified  copy of the actual birth certificate which is on records.

------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Krist, we are about to do just that...

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/petition/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the last person to know the &#8220;legal and contitutional&#8221; definition of &#8220;natural born&#8221; citizen would be a medical doctor; and certainly one in hawaii. De. Fukino does not have the expertise to define, &#8220;natural born&#8221;. This term takes some time for a normal person to understand it after much studing.</p>
<p>So Dr. Fukino is not the person to say; However,<br />
what can be done is that one or many of citzens sign a letter and fill out the request showing that have reason to request the birth certificate of Obama. The Dept of Health then DOES have the responsibility to release it.<br />
Be sure you put on the application, you as a citizen have the right has he ran for office, was elected and your US Constitution states there are birth requirements. Demand the Hawaii department give them to you. We can make it difficult for the state of hawaii if they don&#8217;t release it or at least they will be forced into the court to show just cause why NOT.<br />
The  right place for this was the US Supreme Ct and the Federal Courts (judical branch of gov. when the other 2 fail) but they have failed the people.<br />
Dont ask the hawaii officials their opinoin, it is just that &#8220;an opinion&#8221;. Demand a certified  copy of the actual birth certificate which is on records.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Krist, we are about to do just that&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/petition/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/26/petition/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deuce</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/comment-page-1/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>Deuce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4871#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>Somebody please guide me thru this.  Doesn’t the Attorney General of Hawaii have a responsibility to enforce the laws of his state?  Doesn’t the law specifically state that, although the DOH maintains confidential records on people, once that seal of confidentiality has been broken they can no longer use it as a shield?  

Dr. Fukino has publically stated that she has seen Obama’s birth records and he was born in Hawaii, and is a natural-born citizen.  Since she has gone public with this information, isn’t she legally required to produce proof?

Aren’t the officials in Hawaii continuing to thumb their noses at all requests to have these records open to the public?  If the state law has been violated, where is the Attorney General?  Is he unaware of all of this?  I find that hard to believe.

Why should concerned citizens of the entire U. S. be required to fund a legal challenge to the question of whether the President of the U. S. is eligible to hold that office?  If the officials in Hawaii were doing their jobs as the law says they should, we wouldn’t need a lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody please guide me thru this.  Doesn’t the Attorney General of Hawaii have a responsibility to enforce the laws of his state?  Doesn’t the law specifically state that, although the DOH maintains confidential records on people, once that seal of confidentiality has been broken they can no longer use it as a shield?  </p>
<p>Dr. Fukino has publically stated that she has seen Obama’s birth records and he was born in Hawaii, and is a natural-born citizen.  Since she has gone public with this information, isn’t she legally required to produce proof?</p>
<p>Aren’t the officials in Hawaii continuing to thumb their noses at all requests to have these records open to the public?  If the state law has been violated, where is the Attorney General?  Is he unaware of all of this?  I find that hard to believe.</p>
<p>Why should concerned citizens of the entire U. S. be required to fund a legal challenge to the question of whether the President of the U. S. is eligible to hold that office?  If the officials in Hawaii were doing their jobs as the law says they should, we wouldn’t need a lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/comment-page-1/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4871#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the name of the fund to make a check out to?  Is it &quot;The Post &amp; Email Legal Fund&quot; or &quot;For Open Government in Hawaii&quot;?

And are donations tax-deductible?

-------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; The Post &amp; Email Legal Fund. It is to defray the legal expenses of needy citizens seeking to defend their rights to govt. records availble according to the open government provisions of the State of Hawaii, and that kind of charitable exclusive purpose qualifies for the IRS 501(c)(3) tax status, even though the IRS does actually not require such official recognition.  So yes it is tax deductible. And yes, we are working on getting such a recognition. Donations of more than $250 can ask for a receipt for their taxes; as such level of donation does require a receipt for an itemized deduction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the name of the fund to make a check out to?  Is it &#8220;The Post &amp; Email Legal Fund&#8221; or &#8220;For Open Government in Hawaii&#8221;?</p>
<p>And are donations tax-deductible?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> The Post &#038; Email Legal Fund. It is to defray the legal expenses of needy citizens seeking to defend their rights to govt. records availble according to the open government provisions of the State of Hawaii, and that kind of charitable exclusive purpose qualifies for the IRS 501(c)(3) tax status, even though the IRS does actually not require such official recognition.  So yes it is tax deductible. And yes, we are working on getting such a recognition. Donations of more than $250 can ask for a receipt for their taxes; as such level of donation does require a receipt for an itemized deduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixel Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/citizens-prepare-to-take-legal-action-against-hi-department-of-health/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixel Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4871#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>Merry Christmas

&quot;Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.&quot;
-John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765

&quot;Each individual of the society has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty, and property, according to standing laws. He is obliged, consequently, to contribute his share to the expense of this protection; and to give his personal service, or an equivalent, when necessary. But no part of the property of any individual can, with justice, be taken from him, or applied to public uses, without his own consent, or that of the representative body of the people. In fine, the people of this commonwealth are not controllable by any other laws than those to which their constitutional representative body have given their consent.&quot; 
-John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776

&quot;Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.&quot;
-John Adams, in Defense of the British Soldiers on trial for the Boston Massacre, December 4, 1770

&quot;We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.&quot;
-John Adams, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1797

&quot;Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.&quot;
-Thomas Jefferson
________________________________________________

I don&#039;t sympathize with evil...do you?

Godspeed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas</p>
<p>&#8220;Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.&#8221;<br />
-John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765</p>
<p>&#8220;Each individual of the society has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty, and property, according to standing laws. He is obliged, consequently, to contribute his share to the expense of this protection; and to give his personal service, or an equivalent, when necessary. But no part of the property of any individual can, with justice, be taken from him, or applied to public uses, without his own consent, or that of the representative body of the people. In fine, the people of this commonwealth are not controllable by any other laws than those to which their constitutional representative body have given their consent.&#8221;<br />
-John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776</p>
<p>&#8220;Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.&#8221;<br />
-John Adams, in Defense of the British Soldiers on trial for the Boston Massacre, December 4, 1770</p>
<p>&#8220;We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.&#8221;<br />
-John Adams, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1797</p>
<p>&#8220;Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.&#8221;<br />
-Thomas Jefferson<br />
________________________________________________</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t sympathize with evil&#8230;do you?</p>
<p>Godspeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

