<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HI Department of Health Publicly rebuffs inquiries for Obama&#8217;s vital records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>My filtering is set to medium.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s Nortion, because they should give me an alert message.  I&#039;m not sure though.   Below, I have attached some of the links that show up with a ? after them.  Earlier, I got the ? when finding your link to your article &quot;HI Department of Health Publicly rebuffs inquiries for Obama’s vital records&quot;.  Now when I google for this title, your site does not even show up.  It looks like funny business to me.

NH Rep. Rappaport Requests Investigation of Obama&#039;s Eligibility ... 
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/.../nh-rep-rappaport-requests-investigation-of-obamas-eligibility/Rasmussen polls indicate Orange Revolution by July 2011 

Nov 24, 2009 ... PUBLIC&#039;S GROWING IRE AND MELTING SUPORT FOREBODE DIRE END TO OBAMA REGIME. by John Charlton. (Nov. 29, 2009) — The latest Presidential ...
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/ - Cached

Taitz Files Emergency Stay and Motion for Rehearing - The Post &amp; Email 
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/.../taitz-files-emergency-stay-and-motion-for-rehearing/ - Similar


White House orders attack on Washington Times &#124; The Post &amp; Email 
Dec 3, 2009 ... KERCHNER ADVERTORIAL SPARKS VICIOUS RACE-POLITICS ACTION SIMULTANEOUS

 HACKER-ATTACK OF THE POST &amp; EMAIL BY OBAMA SUPPORTER by John Charlton, ...
www.thepostemail.com/.../white-house-orders-attack-on-washington-times/ - CachedDonofrio confirms Chrysler-Dealers&#039; lawsuit &#124; The Post &amp; Email
 
Dec 7, 2009 ... WITH ATTORNEY STEVEN PIDGEON, FILES QUO WARRANTO ACTION IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA by John Charlton (Dec. 7, 2009) — The Post &amp; Email can ...
www.thepostemail.com/.../donofrio-confirms-chrysler-dealers-lawsuit/ - Cached


Federal Court requested to investigate AP Story « 
Oct 25, 2009 ... (Oct. 25, 2009) — Eleven days ago The Post &amp; Email published its story about the East African Standard report in 2004 naming Obama ...
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/.../federal-court-requested-to-investigate-ap-story/ - Cached

-----------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; All these appear in google when I search for them under their titles.

Also, all searches for --The Post &amp; Email --- and --&quot;The Post &amp; Email&quot;--  also turn up our site, numerous times.

I believe your problem might be in your browser or pc.  Have you tried erasing (dumping) your browser&#039;s cache? and then revisiting google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My filtering is set to medium.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s Nortion, because they should give me an alert message.  I&#8217;m not sure though.   Below, I have attached some of the links that show up with a ? after them.  Earlier, I got the ? when finding your link to your article &#8220;HI Department of Health Publicly rebuffs inquiries for Obama’s vital records&#8221;.  Now when I google for this title, your site does not even show up.  It looks like funny business to me.</p>
<p>NH Rep. Rappaport Requests Investigation of Obama&#8217;s Eligibility &#8230;<br />
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/&#8230;/nh-rep-rappaport-requests-investigation-of-obamas-eligibility/Rasmussen polls indicate Orange Revolution by July 2011 </p>
<p>Nov 24, 2009 &#8230; PUBLIC&#8217;S GROWING IRE AND MELTING SUPORT FOREBODE DIRE END TO OBAMA REGIME. by John Charlton. (Nov. 29, 2009) — The latest Presidential &#8230;<br />
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/ &#8211; Cached</p>
<p>Taitz Files Emergency Stay and Motion for Rehearing &#8211; The Post &amp; Email<br />
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/&#8230;/taitz-files-emergency-stay-and-motion-for-rehearing/ &#8211; Similar</p>
<p>White House orders attack on Washington Times | The Post &amp; Email<br />
Dec 3, 2009 &#8230; KERCHNER ADVERTORIAL SPARKS VICIOUS RACE-POLITICS ACTION SIMULTANEOUS</p>
<p> HACKER-ATTACK OF THE POST &amp; EMAIL BY OBAMA SUPPORTER by John Charlton, &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.thepostemail.com/.../white-house-orders-attack-on-washington-times/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepostemail.com/&#8230;/white-house-orders-attack-on-washington-times/</a> &#8211; CachedDonofrio confirms Chrysler-Dealers&#8217; lawsuit | The Post &amp; Email</p>
<p>Dec 7, 2009 &#8230; WITH ATTORNEY STEVEN PIDGEON, FILES QUO WARRANTO ACTION IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA by John Charlton (Dec. 7, 2009) — The Post &amp; Email can &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.thepostemail.com/.../donofrio-confirms-chrysler-dealers-lawsuit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepostemail.com/&#8230;/donofrio-confirms-chrysler-dealers-lawsuit/</a> &#8211; Cached</p>
<p>Federal Court requested to investigate AP Story «<br />
Oct 25, 2009 &#8230; (Oct. 25, 2009) — Eleven days ago The Post &amp; Email published its story about the East African Standard report in 2004 naming Obama &#8230;<br />
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/&#8230;/federal-court-requested-to-investigate-ap-story/ &#8211; Cached</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> All these appear in google when I search for them under their titles.</p>
<p>Also, all searches for &#8211;The Post &#038; Email &#8212; and &#8211;&#8221;The Post &#038; Email&#8221;&#8211;  also turn up our site, numerous times.</p>
<p>I believe your problem might be in your browser or pc.  Have you tried erasing (dumping) your browser&#8217;s cache? and then revisiting google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>John,  you should google your site.  Many of your articles are comming up with ?????s.  I use Norton.

------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; I see no problems on any of my links at Google.com.

The problem may be that you have set your filtering options on searches at Google to a high level.  Go back to google and check your filter options.  When set to medium filtering or no filtering, no problem shows.

If that is not the issue, and you have norton support, I&#039;d appreciate it if you could get on the phone with them and ask, why the problem is occuring on your computer.  And please let me know what they say. If I can do anything about it, I will, because I want the site visible by all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,  you should google your site.  Many of your articles are comming up with ?????s.  I use Norton.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> I see no problems on any of my links at Google.com.</p>
<p>The problem may be that you have set your filtering options on searches at Google to a high level.  Go back to google and check your filter options.  When set to medium filtering or no filtering, no problem shows.</p>
<p>If that is not the issue, and you have norton support, I&#8217;d appreciate it if you could get on the phone with them and ask, why the problem is occuring on your computer.  And please let me know what they say. If I can do anything about it, I will, because I want the site visible by all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texomaed</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Texomaed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>It is both irrelevant and relevant.  Irrelevant for the precise reason you gave.  Relevant for its distraction from the fact of Obama&#039;s dual citizenship - a fact which alone makes him not a natural born citizen and ineligible to be President.

The birth certificate cannot prove Obama&#039;s eligibility, it can only further disprove it should it show a foreign birth.  But if required to reveal his birth certificate, do we really think that the most powerful man on the planet will be unable to &quot;produce&quot; a piece of paper showing a Hawaiian birth?  On the other hand, there exists no document that will show Obama Senior (Obama&#039;s legal father) to be a US citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is both irrelevant and relevant.  Irrelevant for the precise reason you gave.  Relevant for its distraction from the fact of Obama&#8217;s dual citizenship &#8211; a fact which alone makes him not a natural born citizen and ineligible to be President.</p>
<p>The birth certificate cannot prove Obama&#8217;s eligibility, it can only further disprove it should it show a foreign birth.  But if required to reveal his birth certificate, do we really think that the most powerful man on the planet will be unable to &#8220;produce&#8221; a piece of paper showing a Hawaiian birth?  On the other hand, there exists no document that will show Obama Senior (Obama&#8217;s legal father) to be a US citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>John,  I did not no if you had seen these or not.

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091219/NEWS01/91219001

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091216/NEWS01/912160333/Hawaii-governor-opposes-Akaka-bill-revisions

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091217/BREAKING06/91217054?source=rss_breaking

------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for the links.  We can see from these how politically charged the relationship between HI and the White House is: the complaints however are not about a Senate version which does not give them what they want, but about a version which does not give them all of what they want.

Obama&#039;s promise to the HI estasblishment to give them all of what they want, seems to have such importance to them, that perhaps hiding his vital records has something to do about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,  I did not no if you had seen these or not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091219/NEWS01/91219001" rel="nofollow">http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091219/NEWS01/91219001</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091216/NEWS01/912160333/Hawaii-governor-opposes-Akaka-bill-revisions" rel="nofollow">http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091216/NEWS01/912160333/Hawaii-governor-opposes-Akaka-bill-revisions</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091217/BREAKING06/91217054?source=rss_breaking" rel="nofollow">http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091217/BREAKING06/91217054?source=rss_breaking</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Thanks for the links.  We can see from these how politically charged the relationship between HI and the White House is: the complaints however are not about a Senate version which does not give them what they want, but about a version which does not give them all of what they want.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s promise to the HI estasblishment to give them all of what they want, seems to have such importance to them, that perhaps hiding his vital records has something to do about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksdb</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>ksdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>If the DOH has to put a Web page together like this, then they are admitting that there is a legitimate public interest in whatever vital records are on file for Obama or his aliases. Their own state law says public interest outweighs privacy ... plus Obama is the most public figure in the world. He has no assumed right of privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the DOH has to put a Web page together like this, then they are admitting that there is a legitimate public interest in whatever vital records are on file for Obama or his aliases. Their own state law says public interest outweighs privacy &#8230; plus Obama is the most public figure in the world. He has no assumed right of privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceTrey</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>IceTrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>This is all irrelevant.  Obama has already publicly admitted that he was a British citizen at birth. This is all the information that is needed to determine that he is not a natural born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to be the POTUS.

--------------------

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Its is not pertinent directly to the NBC issue or his eligiblity; correct.  But is its relevant to the large issue of convincing the general public to remove him from office.  I don&#039;t believe that he could be impeached, because I don&#039;t recognize him as holding the office legitimately; but if Congress moves to impeach him after the 2010 elections, then I&#039;m all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all irrelevant.  Obama has already publicly admitted that he was a British citizen at birth. This is all the information that is needed to determine that he is not a natural born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to be the POTUS.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Its is not pertinent directly to the NBC issue or his eligiblity; correct.  But is its relevant to the large issue of convincing the general public to remove him from office.  I don&#8217;t believe that he could be impeached, because I don&#8217;t recognize him as holding the office legitimately; but if Congress moves to impeach him after the 2010 elections, then I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnyroten</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3968</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnyroten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3968</guid>
		<description>just boycott HI until they give full disclosure.........if anthing gets them to act, a boycott will, the citizens of HI will demand the release :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just boycott HI until they give full disclosure&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;if anthing gets them to act, a boycott will, the citizens of HI will demand the release :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deuce</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3965</link>
		<dc:creator>Deuce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3965</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obvious that the DoH in Hawaii will stonewall this thing as long as they can.  Fukino has said that Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born citizen.  Now that she has gone public with this information it becomes part of the public domain, but they still want to maintain secrecy.  It&#039;s time for someone to hit these coconut heads in Hawaii with a lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious that the DoH in Hawaii will stonewall this thing as long as they can.  Fukino has said that Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born citizen.  Now that she has gone public with this information it becomes part of the public domain, but they still want to maintain secrecy.  It&#8217;s time for someone to hit these coconut heads in Hawaii with a lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Galt</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3963</link>
		<dc:creator>John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3963</guid>
		<description>Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?
 By Joan Swirsky  Tuesday, August 25, 2009 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14089</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?<br />
 By Joan Swirsky  Tuesday, August 25, 2009 </p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14089" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14089</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/18/hi-department-of-health-publically-rebuffs-inquiries-for-obamas-vital-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3959</link>
		<dc:creator>yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=4438#comment-3959</guid>
		<description>I go back to a comment that someone made a few weeks ago. They said &quot;where are the lawyers?&quot;

There are undoubtedly lawyers in Hawaii that have such extensive experience in this field that they would could, without hesitation, inform us of what &#039;filed vs accepted&#039; means. 

And there must be lawyers who have dealt with oip that would know how to use the disclosure laws to find out things quickly.

Are they all, the whole lot of them, so scared of never doing another piece of business in Hawaii that they&#039;re all collectively keeping their mouths tightly shut?

We&#039;re but one step from Stalinist Russia, folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go back to a comment that someone made a few weeks ago. They said &#8220;where are the lawyers?&#8221;</p>
<p>There are undoubtedly lawyers in Hawaii that have such extensive experience in this field that they would could, without hesitation, inform us of what &#8216;filed vs accepted&#8217; means. </p>
<p>And there must be lawyers who have dealt with oip that would know how to use the disclosure laws to find out things quickly.</p>
<p>Are they all, the whole lot of them, so scared of never doing another piece of business in Hawaii that they&#8217;re all collectively keeping their mouths tightly shut?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re but one step from Stalinist Russia, folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
