Comments on: Major Cook appeals to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/09/major-cook-appeals-to-the-11th-circuit-in-atlanta/ News Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:17:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: Follow the Constitution http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/09/major-cook-appeals-to-the-11th-circuit-in-atlanta/comment-page-1/#comment-3710 Follow the Constitution Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:23:59 +0000 http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3970#comment-3710 United States v Lee 106 U.S. 196, 1 S.Ct. 240 (1882): the Court stated: "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives," at 220 Haas v. Henkel, 1909, 30 S.Ct. 249, 216 U.S. 462, 54 L.Ed. 569, 17 Ann.Cas. 1112 where court said: "The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful functions of any department of government," and United States v. Walter, 1923, 44 S.Ct. 10, 263 U.S. 15, 68 L.Ed. 137. In Henkel, party conspired to use official government information in a scheme of fraud. “Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.” Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 359, 371, 374 “Due process of law and the equal protection of the laws are secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government.” Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 382 (1894) United States v Lee 106 U.S. 196, 1 S.Ct. 240 (1882): the Court stated: “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives,” at 220

Haas v. Henkel, 1909, 30 S.Ct. 249, 216 U.S. 462, 54 L.Ed. 569, 17 Ann.Cas. 1112 where court said: “The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful functions of any department of government,” and United States v. Walter, 1923, 44 S.Ct. 10, 263 U.S. 15, 68 L.Ed. 137. In Henkel, party conspired to use official government information in a scheme of fraud.

“Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately disregards the requirements of fairness and due process.” Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance, (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 359, 371, 374

“Due process of law and the equal protection of the laws are secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government.” Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 382 (1894)

]]>