Comments on: Chalice demands Illinois Grand Jury to begin investigation of Election Fraud

By: Joe The Blogger

Joe The Blogger — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:57:25 +0000

Way to go, Chalice. Give ‘em Hell.

By: drkate

drkate — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:39:42 +0000

The blog http://jbjd.wordpress.com has the relevant documentation as well as varying state certification requirements that NP signed. There are four states that are known so far. Chalice makes a good start here, as every state relied on NP, and NP can’t prove and/or had no knowledge except fact check whether Obama was eligible. Find the fraud in Pelosi and Germond, as well as Howard Dean in Illinois, and you’ve got a very interesting election fraud case.

—————
Mr. Charlton replies: Many other states, than just 4, have laws which can be used to charge election fraud.

NH for instance http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/09/18/basis-for-election-fraud-in-new-hampsire/

Search your own state’s laws using the words “fraud”, “voter”, “election”, “nomination”, and “certification” and you will easily find which laws can be used in your state.

By: Chalice

Chalice — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:19:53 +0000

Epiourious,
I am definitely interested! Any way you can reach me today in email? I am preparing something right now….

GrandJury@phnmedia.com

Thanks!
Chalice

By: epicurious

epicurious — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:22:17 +0000

The language in the 2008 DNC Certification of Nomination is identical to the language contained in the 2000 and 2004 DNC certifications. The State of HI however requires the constitutionally qualified language so the DNC cert sent to HI Elections was amended to include it.

What is strange is the HI Elections requires both the state and national party to submit a certification of nomination and the Hawaii Democratic Party certificate was radically altered when compared the HDP certificates for 2000 and 2004. The constitutionally qualified language was purposely deleted from the 2008 HDP certificate. In fact the HDP certificate makes no sense whatsoever. It states something to the effect that Obama was qualified simply because he won the HI caucus and DNC delegate majority.

The big question in my mind is why did the HDP eliminate the “constitutionally qualified” language from its certification? Some speculate it is because William Gilardy, who was Ann’s divorce attorney for her divorce from Soetoro is an active member of the HDP and at one time served as its general counsel. In essence, what does Gilardy or other state party officials know that would prevent the HDP from stating Obama is “constitutionally qualified”?

I am not sure why but it is a misnomer that the 2008 DNC certificate is somehow different than certificates for previous Democratic presidential candidates.

Also, most state’s do not require any such language in the DNC certification. Otherwise it would be included in the DNC certificate across the board. HI is the only state I am aware of that has such a requirement. Many states just require the candidate to submit a sworn statement or affidavit that they are qualifed to serve in the office they are seeking.

I have the relevant docs if interested.

By: | NwoDaily.com

| NwoDaily.com — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:25 +0000

[...] SHARON ANN MERONI & 20 FELLOW PATRIOTS TAKE DECISIVE ACTIONby John Charlton (Dec. 9, 2009) — The famous Blogger Radio host, known around the country as “Chalice Jackson,” appeared before the McHenry Country grand jury, demanding an investigation into the massive 2008 Election fraud in the State of Illinois. According to the report by Jillian Duchnowiski of the Northwest Herald, Sharon Ann Meroni presented a petition in which sought to ““to compel testimony to determine how this voter fraud was perpetrated against her, against the residents of McHenry County and of the great state of Illinois.” [...]