<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What will Obama say to Nathan Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe The Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe The Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s bubble has burst.  Americans are waking up.  A momentum is building now.  Suddenly, it is alright to say &quot;The Emperor has no clothes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s bubble has burst.  Americans are waking up.  A momentum is building now.  Suddenly, it is alright to say &#8220;The Emperor has no clothes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Showme State</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3607</link>
		<dc:creator>Showme State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3607</guid>
		<description>I have a conundrum which I hope somebody can answer with reasonable and rational points over Obama&#039;s allegedly questionable origins. When somebody runs for higher offices of all states or federal government a most thorough background check is made by all security services (none of us want a Manchurian Candidate do we?). When Obama first announced his presidential campaign, Dubya still had Cheney pulling his strings. It would have been in Cheney and the GOPs interest to continue the hegemony by officially exposing Obama - he would surely have sunk without trace, so why didn&#039;t they? 

Either the rumours are false, OR I could be very unpatriotic and say FBI, CIA etc do a rubbish job and collectively are as useful as a chocolate coffee pot, but I won&#039;t. When running for senate their investigations into Obama should have found his secrets, so in my perception some people are just whistling the wind because they were sore at the election result - remember democrat fury over the Floridian butterfly ballot paper? Well in my book the cycle has spun and its the republican&#039;s turn to have their noses put out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a conundrum which I hope somebody can answer with reasonable and rational points over Obama&#8217;s allegedly questionable origins. When somebody runs for higher offices of all states or federal government a most thorough background check is made by all security services (none of us want a Manchurian Candidate do we?). When Obama first announced his presidential campaign, Dubya still had Cheney pulling his strings. It would have been in Cheney and the GOPs interest to continue the hegemony by officially exposing Obama &#8211; he would surely have sunk without trace, so why didn&#8217;t they? </p>
<p>Either the rumours are false, OR I could be very unpatriotic and say FBI, CIA etc do a rubbish job and collectively are as useful as a chocolate coffee pot, but I won&#8217;t. When running for senate their investigations into Obama should have found his secrets, so in my perception some people are just whistling the wind because they were sore at the election result &#8211; remember democrat fury over the Floridian butterfly ballot paper? Well in my book the cycle has spun and its the republican&#8217;s turn to have their noses put out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live oak</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3606</link>
		<dc:creator>live oak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3606</guid>
		<description>Right you are David!  
 I hope this Nathan Deal will stand up and be counted.  He will look very foolish if he doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are David!<br />
 I hope this Nathan Deal will stand up and be counted.  He will look very foolish if he doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>Obama will say NOTHING to Nathan Deal because...he can&#039;t say anything ! He is a fraud and a liar. The question is...what will Nathan Deal DO when Obama fails to answer? or Will he just let it go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will say NOTHING to Nathan Deal because&#8230;he can&#8217;t say anything ! He is a fraud and a liar. The question is&#8230;what will Nathan Deal DO when Obama fails to answer? or Will he just let it go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theviking711</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3600</link>
		<dc:creator>theviking711</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3600</guid>
		<description>Great article. However, while you did mention Race Bannon&#039;s statement, You omitted Lucas Smith&#039;s document. He went to Kenya &amp; obtained a bc for Obama from the hospital there. It has signatures, the seal, &amp; more. That item is just as important as any other evidence to date. It has been entered into court, accompanied by Lucas sworn affidavit as to it&#039;s authenticity &amp; how he obtained it. I mean no offense to Race, but without Lucas document, his story is a recollection that will fall into &quot;he said, he didn&#039;t say&quot;.  Lucas&#039; document &amp; Race&#039;s statement combined is the nuclear weapon the Birther movement has been looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. However, while you did mention Race Bannon&#8217;s statement, You omitted Lucas Smith&#8217;s document. He went to Kenya &amp; obtained a bc for Obama from the hospital there. It has signatures, the seal, &amp; more. That item is just as important as any other evidence to date. It has been entered into court, accompanied by Lucas sworn affidavit as to it&#8217;s authenticity &amp; how he obtained it. I mean no offense to Race, but without Lucas document, his story is a recollection that will fall into &#8220;he said, he didn&#8217;t say&#8221;.  Lucas&#8217; document &amp; Race&#8217;s statement combined is the nuclear weapon the Birther movement has been looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live oak</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3598</link>
		<dc:creator>live oak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3598</guid>
		<description>Nathan Deal and the other men who signed that paper need to keep asking and keep up the pressure on Kenya Boy.  Demand all records....then go after Peloser for election fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan Deal and the other men who signed that paper need to keep asking and keep up the pressure on Kenya Boy.  Demand all records&#8230;.then go after Peloser for election fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Showme State</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Showme State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>I have a conundrum which I hope somebody can answer with reasonable and rational points over Obama&#039;s allegedly questionable origins. When somebody runs for higher offices of all states or federal government a most thorough background check is made by all security services (none of us want a Manchurian Candidate do we?). When Obama first announced his presidential campaign, Dubya still had Cheney pulling his strings. It would have been in Cheney and the GOPs interest to continue the hegemony by officially exposing Obama - he would surely have sunk without trace, so why didn&#039;t they? 

Either the rumours are false, OR I could be very unpatriotic and say FBI, CIA etc do a rubbish job and collectively are as useful as a chocolate coffee pot, but I won&#039;t. When running for senate their investigations into Obama should have found his secrets, so in my perception some people are just whistling the wind because they were sore at the election result - remember democrat fury over the Floridian butterfly ballot paper? Well in my book the cycle has spun and its the republican&#039;s turn to have their noses put out.

---------------
&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Showme, use our search form and search for &quot;NBC game&quot; and you will have your answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a conundrum which I hope somebody can answer with reasonable and rational points over Obama&#8217;s allegedly questionable origins. When somebody runs for higher offices of all states or federal government a most thorough background check is made by all security services (none of us want a Manchurian Candidate do we?). When Obama first announced his presidential campaign, Dubya still had Cheney pulling his strings. It would have been in Cheney and the GOPs interest to continue the hegemony by officially exposing Obama &#8211; he would surely have sunk without trace, so why didn&#8217;t they? </p>
<p>Either the rumours are false, OR I could be very unpatriotic and say FBI, CIA etc do a rubbish job and collectively are as useful as a chocolate coffee pot, but I won&#8217;t. When running for senate their investigations into Obama should have found his secrets, so in my perception some people are just whistling the wind because they were sore at the election result &#8211; remember democrat fury over the Floridian butterfly ballot paper? Well in my book the cycle has spun and its the republican&#8217;s turn to have their noses put out.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
<strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Showme, use our search form and search for &#8220;NBC game&#8221; and you will have your answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3593</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3593</guid>
		<description>All records need to be released on this fraud not just his BC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All records need to be released on this fraud not just his BC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>Exactly Jon.  It is amazing to see every official avoid the fact most of them know - clearly a subject too hot for them to even acknowledge.  &quot;Born of the soil of parents who are its citizens.&quot;  Time and again the Supreme Court has acknowledged the common law definition, with C.J. Waite even refering to it as &quot;...by our common law&quot;.  None of us can be certain of Obama&#039;s birthplace, but we are all assured by Obama that his father, and thus he himself, was born a British subject.  This is a direct violation of the &quot;parents who are its citizens&quot; provision, often referred to as &quot;jus sanguinis.&quot;  Our founders were justifiably concerned with foreign intrigue.  Now we have &quot;global citizen&quot; Obama  because our representatives and our courts are pretending that our Constitution no longer means what it did until 2008 when Jim Leahy and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and ... all signed Senate Resolution 511 asserting that &quot;Because his parents were citizen of the U.S., John McCain is a natural born citizen.&quot;  They were joined by former federal judge Michael Chertoff, who reinforced their assertion that citizen parents make one a natural born citizen.  Forget that they chose to ignore jus soli, they all signed Senate Res. 511.  Let&#039;s not gamble with the legal smokescreens provided by Obama&#039;s legal team.  Obama is ineligible because he was born a British subject.  The &quot;grandfather clause&quot; in the Constitution provided that colonial citizens born before the Constitution were eligible, but no one born outside of the U.S., and no one whose parents were not U.S. citizens can be president since the ratification. 

Unless Obama manages, as Zelaya tried in Honduras, to amend or replace our Constitution, no bill he has signed has the force of law - which may be a good thing, and might possibly provide a charitable explaination for why so many lawmakers have chosen to remain silent about Obama&#039;s British citizenship at birth.  That our courts and our military are complicit in seeing the emporer&#039;s new interpretation - since 2008 - of Article II Section I clause 5, is particularly frightening, because, while we head for an inevitiable financial cliff, fighting men are dying as a direct result of the allegiances of this commander in chief.  John Jay, John Marshall, Joseph Storey,  George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, John Binghim, C.J. Waite, all knew our laws and applied them scrupulously to protect our freedoms.  Obama is intent on removing those freedoms and blatently ignores the Constitution created to protect them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Jon.  It is amazing to see every official avoid the fact most of them know &#8211; clearly a subject too hot for them to even acknowledge.  &#8220;Born of the soil of parents who are its citizens.&#8221;  Time and again the Supreme Court has acknowledged the common law definition, with C.J. Waite even refering to it as &#8220;&#8230;by our common law&#8221;.  None of us can be certain of Obama&#8217;s birthplace, but we are all assured by Obama that his father, and thus he himself, was born a British subject.  This is a direct violation of the &#8220;parents who are its citizens&#8221; provision, often referred to as &#8220;jus sanguinis.&#8221;  Our founders were justifiably concerned with foreign intrigue.  Now we have &#8220;global citizen&#8221; Obama  because our representatives and our courts are pretending that our Constitution no longer means what it did until 2008 when Jim Leahy and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and &#8230; all signed Senate Resolution 511 asserting that &#8220;Because his parents were citizen of the U.S., John McCain is a natural born citizen.&#8221;  They were joined by former federal judge Michael Chertoff, who reinforced their assertion that citizen parents make one a natural born citizen.  Forget that they chose to ignore jus soli, they all signed Senate Res. 511.  Let&#8217;s not gamble with the legal smokescreens provided by Obama&#8217;s legal team.  Obama is ineligible because he was born a British subject.  The &#8220;grandfather clause&#8221; in the Constitution provided that colonial citizens born before the Constitution were eligible, but no one born outside of the U.S., and no one whose parents were not U.S. citizens can be president since the ratification. </p>
<p>Unless Obama manages, as Zelaya tried in Honduras, to amend or replace our Constitution, no bill he has signed has the force of law &#8211; which may be a good thing, and might possibly provide a charitable explaination for why so many lawmakers have chosen to remain silent about Obama&#8217;s British citizenship at birth.  That our courts and our military are complicit in seeing the emporer&#8217;s new interpretation &#8211; since 2008 &#8211; of Article II Section I clause 5, is particularly frightening, because, while we head for an inevitiable financial cliff, fighting men are dying as a direct result of the allegiances of this commander in chief.  John Jay, John Marshall, Joseph Storey,  George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, John Binghim, C.J. Waite, all knew our laws and applied them scrupulously to protect our freedoms.  Obama is intent on removing those freedoms and blatently ignores the Constitution created to protect them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceP1974</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/04/what-will-obama-say-to-nathan-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceP1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=3709#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Jon: i agree with you totally. I&#039;ve argued myself blue in the face to the people who insist that the Birth Certificate is the smoking gun.

They&#039;re leaving themselves wide-open to be discredited by the presentation of a genuine or fake Birth Certificate by Obama (an inevitability is that he is going to have to come up with of these eventually)

That fact that he was born a dual citizen (a fact no one denies) makes him ineligible no matter where he was born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon: i agree with you totally. I&#8217;ve argued myself blue in the face to the people who insist that the Birth Certificate is the smoking gun.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re leaving themselves wide-open to be discredited by the presentation of a genuine or fake Birth Certificate by Obama (an inevitability is that he is going to have to come up with of these eventually)</p>
<p>That fact that he was born a dual citizen (a fact no one denies) makes him ineligible no matter where he was born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

