<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death certificate of Jesus Christ found on Shroud of Turin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/</link>
	<description>News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/comment-page-1/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2878#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>If the Vatican can find Jesus&#039; death certificate then surely they will be able to find Barry Soetoro&#039;s birth certificate.
---------------
&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; Owens calls the doctoress a Vatican scholar.  That is not exactly correct.  The Vatican has no such researchers.  But it does have an honory panel of scientists which is called the Pontifical Academy of Science.  Members are sometimes incorrectly called Vatican scholars or scientists, but they are no such thing.  They are merely receivers of honorary membership and sometimes consulted on specific issues.  This authors statments in her book are not approved by pope Benedict XVI, any more than any other book published by a member of the academy; that is, there is no such approval.  Of course her books findings are of a great interest to all Christians, the pope too. But it is not a question of the Catholic Church requiring anyone to believe them.

However, I found your quip amusing, nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Vatican can find Jesus&#8217; death certificate then surely they will be able to find Barry Soetoro&#8217;s birth certificate.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
<strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> Owens calls the doctoress a Vatican scholar.  That is not exactly correct.  The Vatican has no such researchers.  But it does have an honory panel of scientists which is called the Pontifical Academy of Science.  Members are sometimes incorrectly called Vatican scholars or scientists, but they are no such thing.  They are merely receivers of honorary membership and sometimes consulted on specific issues.  This authors statments in her book are not approved by pope Benedict XVI, any more than any other book published by a member of the academy; that is, there is no such approval.  Of course her books findings are of a great interest to all Christians, the pope too. But it is not a question of the Catholic Church requiring anyone to believe them.</p>
<p>However, I found your quip amusing, nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/comment-page-1/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2878#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>Ever since the forensic examination of the sciencetist in 1978.  I was personally confinced this was unquestionable a miraculous revalation of a historical truth. Of course, then came the radio-carbon dating. Which, of course, just recently was refutted. Then the sciencetist said, that there were samples taken at some point where additional radio-carbon testing could be preformed. This is truly amazing! Thinking back it seems, it was also noted that there were also Roman coins placed over,&quot;His&quot;eyes, dating to the time attributed to the cruxifixtion.  Many conflicting reports. The discovery and translation of words confirms precisely that the relic is no doubt,&quot;the Christ&quot;. A radio-carbon dating of the linen that was removed would without question confirm beyond any doubts, there will be no skeptics. We are all,&quot;doubting Thomasces&quot;, from time to time. Especially, these days. The renewal of our faith in Christ is most certainly timely as to where our course is in this Nation. Stay the course of our,&quot;founding Father&#039;s&quot;, as their faith has been uplifted over all times. Here even now in the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the forensic examination of the sciencetist in 1978.  I was personally confinced this was unquestionable a miraculous revalation of a historical truth. Of course, then came the radio-carbon dating. Which, of course, just recently was refutted. Then the sciencetist said, that there were samples taken at some point where additional radio-carbon testing could be preformed. This is truly amazing! Thinking back it seems, it was also noted that there were also Roman coins placed over,&#8221;His&#8221;eyes, dating to the time attributed to the cruxifixtion.  Many conflicting reports. The discovery and translation of words confirms precisely that the relic is no doubt,&#8221;the Christ&#8221;. A radio-carbon dating of the linen that was removed would without question confirm beyond any doubts, there will be no skeptics. We are all,&#8221;doubting Thomasces&#8221;, from time to time. Especially, these days. The renewal of our faith in Christ is most certainly timely as to where our course is in this Nation. Stay the course of our,&#8221;founding Father&#8217;s&#8221;, as their faith has been uplifted over all times. Here even now in the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/comment-page-1/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2878#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>Re:  Death Certificate of Jesus Christ found


Update from the recognized Shroud of Turin historical and scientific site:

http://www.shroud.com/latebrak.htm
-----------------
&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Charlton replies:&lt;/strong&gt; And this expert basically says he does not like researchers publishing books, though as a orthodox Jew he believe the Shroud to be that of Jesus Christ.  I really don&#039;t see his point: he argues that her findings are not scientific, but gives no scientific basis for his critique.  As one who has done image enhancement, I know that simply because an image is enhanced does not cause letters to appear, where they would not appear.  As one who has read many a scientific paper on archeological studies, I know how studies of the remnants of ancient writings are poorly misunderstood by even scientists who have no training in this field.  This author claims no such knowledge himself.  As photographer has no expertise to critique such an analysis.  That should be obvious. But the rest of his site is very good, even if this editorial of his is rather worthless, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Death Certificate of Jesus Christ found</p>
<p>Update from the recognized Shroud of Turin historical and scientific site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shroud.com/latebrak.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.shroud.com/latebrak.htm</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<strong>Mr. Charlton replies:</strong> And this expert basically says he does not like researchers publishing books, though as a orthodox Jew he believe the Shroud to be that of Jesus Christ.  I really don&#8217;t see his point: he argues that her findings are not scientific, but gives no scientific basis for his critique.  As one who has done image enhancement, I know that simply because an image is enhanced does not cause letters to appear, where they would not appear.  As one who has read many a scientific paper on archeological studies, I know how studies of the remnants of ancient writings are poorly misunderstood by even scientists who have no training in this field.  This author claims no such knowledge himself.  As photographer has no expertise to critique such an analysis.  That should be obvious. But the rest of his site is very good, even if this editorial of his is rather worthless, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/comment-page-1/#comment-3370</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2878#comment-3370</guid>
		<description>Forgot the link:

http://www.factsplusfacts.com/shroud-of-turin-negativity.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.factsplusfacts.com/shroud-of-turin-negativity.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.factsplusfacts.com/shroud-of-turin-negativity.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/11/21/death-certificate-of-jesus-christ-found-on-shroud-of-turin/comment-page-1/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepostemail.com/?p=2878#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>The Shroud is a negative image. When photographed, the negative is a positive!

It&#039;s literally a photograph of Christ. Impossible to fake before photography was discovered. This wasn&#039;t discovered until 1898 when someone took a photo of it, and looked at the negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shroud is a negative image. When photographed, the negative is a positive!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s literally a photograph of Christ. Impossible to fake before photography was discovered. This wasn&#8217;t discovered until 1898 when someone took a photo of it, and looked at the negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
