Comments on: Taitz files Motion for Reconsideration in Barnett vs. Obama

By: TOM OMALLEY

TOM OMALLEY — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:09:32 +0000

What about the two Certificates of Nomination from the Democratic Party. One was prepared including an eligibility clause for Hawaii, as required by its Constitution. The second one omitted the eligibility clause, which was sent to the other 49 states. Pelosi signed both on the same day.
Why two versions of the certificate? Pelosi knows the truth. There are powerful, rich forces in play here.

By: TOM OMALLEY

TOM OMALLEY — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:06:05 +0000

Judge Carter hired as a law clerk, a lawyer from the very law firm defending Obama! Orly Taitz said the Judge’s demeanor changed drastically after that.
It would appear the judge was threatened in some way, and forced to hire the law clerk, which is a conflict of interest. Also, the nasty way he wrote his document appears to be intended to appease those who threatened him. By forcing the judge to hire the law clerk, and writing his nasty document, which is completely out of character for him, reveals to thousands of people the evil of the man in the Oval Office. This series of events proves to many people that the case against Obama is true.

By: Judge Carter is afraid to face Orly Taitz | The Post & Email

Judge Carter is afraid to face Orly Taitz | The Post & Email — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:30:35 +0000

[...] the vicious, unfounded, and gratuitous insults hurled at her in Carter’s official court ruling, Dr. Tait filed a Motion for Reconsideration accompanied by affidavits defending herself and laying out the facts of the [...]

By: Tim Fotsch

Tim Fotsch — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:32:27 +0000

I sincerely believe someone from Obama’s camp must have threatened Judge Carter’s life for him to have made such a cowardly and unethical decision. Judge Carters history as a prudent jurist seems to have completely gone down the tubes.

By: Cardona opposes Taitz’s Motion to Reconsider «

Cardona opposes Taitz’s Motion to Reconsider « — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:08:04 +0000

[...] Taitz in her Motion had listed numerous errors of fact and law in Judge David O. Carter’s decision, which dismissed the First Amended Complaint in the [...]

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:08:54 +0000

It would appear that Judge Carter has four options:

1. Summarily Deny in its entirety Orly’s Motion for Reconsideration without comment or decision.

2. Deny in its entitety Orly’s Motion for Reconsideration with an explanatory decision addressing Orly’s argument(s).

3. Grant Orly’s Motion for Reconsideration, at least in part, with or without an explanatory decision.

4. Bypass Orly’s Motion for Reconsideration and simply grant Orly leave to file a second amended complaint against Obama, as requested by Orly in the alternative.

———————–
Mr. Charlton replies: You might add, deny the Motion and sanction her for outing his ruling as error ridden as swiss cheese is hole-ridden.

By: rlstarnes

rlstarnes — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:22:06 +0000

I think every Marine needs to send this Judge two words, Semper Fi. If he is a respectable man, Veteran and Judge how could he take such a cowardly approach. It’s quite simple. Where is the Birth Certificate, Mr. Obama? Why would Judge Carter not want to know, as well as the rest of the U.S. God Bless America, Thank you to all who have served to Protect her.

By: Cris Ericson 2010

Cris Ericson 2010 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:45:19 +0000

Jurisdiction is correct because this is multi-district litigation, and should be filed as multi-district litigation, because the President holds authority in every district of the U.S.A., therefore the plaintiff can file in the district most convenient for the plaintiff. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

By: vrwcshirts

vrwcshirts — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:22:41 +0000

So the Jan 26th court date is not going to happen? The information regarding these cases are misleading. What is going on?
—————
Mr. Charlton replies: VRWCshirts, you have to realize that these cases move not only through the courts but through time: when you are reading any report look at the date of the report; the case schedule was set after the Oct. 5th hearing, but it became a moot issue with the dismissal of the First Amended Complaint. Even if Carter would grant the motion to reconsider (which no one, I presume, believes is likely) the dates for the trial would change.

By: Harry H

Harry H — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:25:43 +0000

It ain’t over till it’s over, and it won’t be over until Barry/Barack Obuma/Suterro/Soetero vacates the premises. Orly should get a Medal of Freedom for her heroic efforts to see justice done, whereas our congressional leaders and judges deserve only our contempt.

Thanks, John, for breaking down Orly’s excellent motion into bite-sized chunks. Now the people cry for justice.