Comments on: 4 Supreme Court Cases define "natural born citizen"

By: The COVER-UP continues… | NwoDaily.com

The COVER-UP continues… | NwoDaily.com — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:40:17 +0000

[...] citizen, according to the manner in which this term was intended in the U.S. Constitution, and in 4 Supreme Court Cases, is one who is born in the U.S.A. of two parents, each of which was a U.S. citizen at the time of [...]

By: Mega Media counter attack on Natural Born Citizen issue | The Post & Email

Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:35:37 +0000

By: An Open Letter to Sarah Palin | The Post & Email

An Open Letter to Sarah Palin | The Post & Email — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:04:11 +0000

[...] am a natural born citizen of the United States.” It is impossible for the birth status of a natural born U.S. citizen to be governed by British [...]

By: Editorial: Nov. 11, 2009 — Bring up the Second Line! «

Editorial: Nov. 11, 2009 — Bring up the Second Line! « — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:04:33 +0000

[...] background-hiding, candidate whom literary who-knows-where — fraudulent, in that he is not a natural born citizen, and hence is not eligible for the office of U.S. President — a series of patriots brought law [...]

By: GOP Gov. Candidate in GA to ask Obama for BC «

GOP Gov. Candidate in GA to ask Obama for BC « — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:43:02 +0000

[...] to the only definition of “natural born citizen” endorsed by the U.S. Supreme Court, Obama does not qualify, if his father was in fact Barrack Hussein Obama, Senior, a british subject [...]

By: James H. (Jim) Roberson

James H. (Jim) Roberson — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:05:04 +0000

John,
Below is a Post that I recently made …

————–
Mr. Charlton replies: Mr. Roberson, thank you for your post and compliments; but as I don’t what the comment section to be misunderstood as a forum for commenting on other blogs, I have decided not to post what you said. I remain the good friend of every patriot, even if we do not always see eye to eye on every issue.

By: Obama knows he is not a Natural Born Citizen according to Vattel «

Obama knows he is not a Natural Born Citizen according to Vattel « — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:21:28 +0000

[...] father was a British subject at birth, and therefore according to 4 Supreme Court rulings, Obama is not qualified as a “natural born citizen”, and thus cannot lawfully hold the [...]

By: Judge Carter ignores Constitutional requirements of office for President «

Judge Carter ignores Constitutional requirements of office for President « — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:45:48 +0000

[...] truth Barack Hussein Obama —because of his British father and the 4 rulings of the Supreme Court which require both parents be U.S. Citizens at the time of the birth of the child, for that child [...]

By: btw

btw — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:46:41 +0000

A Constitutional problem?

If we consider together US Constitution (especially 14th Amendment) and The Oath of Allegiance, we’ll get the only inference:
Natural Born Citizen (NBC) is a person that born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof.

This inference has a foundation that only one (the US) jurisdiction is allowed for US Citizens (NBC or Naturalized) – because Naturalized citizens according The Oath of Allegiance are allowed to have only the US juricdiction; but citizens of both groups (NBC and Naturalized) have absolutely the same rights and protection according Constitution except only one thing: only NBC have a right to be POTUS (President Of The United States) . It means that according Constitution dual citizenship isn’t allowed for any citizen (NBC or Naturalized). Because of that Mr. Obama coudn’t be NBC. See details with a short introduction through

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/1-thing-is-certain-about-obama/#comment-1251

or immediately here:

http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=2783.msg12853#msg12853

One can say that there is in reality a practice of dual citizenship in the US that was allowed by laws accepted by Congress during a history of the US. I don’t see any other way to constitutionally reconcile both things – the inference from The Oath of Allegiance and a current practice of dual citizenship – than to state that in my opinion all this practice contradicts US Constitution (or The Oath of Allegiance contradicts Constitution – your choice); so (in my view) there is a great Constitutional problem that demands an attention of SCOTUS.

By: smither

smither — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:45:18 +0000

RJ,

FaxYourOpinion.com allows you to send a FAX to elected officials for $0.10 per single page FAX. There is also a single $0.40 transaction fee. A FAX to all US Senators (100 destinations) costs $10.40. This may be the least expensive such service available.